If one bought a Security Six, one could expect a lifetime of full use and still be able to hand it to one’s children with nary a problem. razorback2003 Member. Thirty years on and a good used Security Six can be had in the lower $300 price range. Smith will have a better trigger, although the ruger is serviceable and will get better with use. Both with a 4 inch barrel and the 66 being $700 the GP100 is $600. -Benjamin Franklin. It oughta be a good pistol to you. 7. A place for responsible gun owners and enthusiasts to talk about guns without the politics. Ruger GP100 22 VS Smith 617. I've narrowed it down to the 686 vs GP100. I have a stainless 6" GP100, and my slogan for it is "Rick Grimes can suck it.". I give you my thoughts and the impressions of 3 other shooters. Come join the discussion about optics, gunsmithing, styles, reviews, accessories, classifieds, and more! Recently went thru a similar situation, S&W vs Ruger.. 1:45. Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. The frame, cylinder release, sideplate, and crane arrangement are unmistakably S&W. Ruger GP-100 vs. Smith & Wesson 686. It'll outlive your grandkids, and easy to strip. Plus, on my particular gun, it would get dirty very quickly (<100 rounds) and half of the cylinder would be harder to cock/work in double action. Hey all. This is a table top review and comparison of the Smith & Wesson Model 686, Ruger GP100 and the Taurus Model 627 Tracker. I find that I can usually shoot it more accurately. Single action: The Ruger is much improved but the Smith and Wesson is like glass. Ruger chambers are usually a bit oversized, easing extraction when dirty, if compromising case life somewhat. I can't remember the last time I shot a Ruger revolver (but I have four of their semiauto's) Two of the newest five-shot, medium-framed .44s—the Ruger GP100 and the Smith & Wesson Model 69—duke it out. Hopefully some folks out there have tried out the new Ruger GP100 22. razorback2003, Jan 21, 2016 … A forum community dedicated to Springfield Armory XD and XD-M series firearm owners and enthusiasts. Tags: None. Double action: I hate to admit it but, with the new springs installed, the Ruger edges out the Smith and Wesson. I like both of these pistols but have no Idea what one to purchase. I like the classic lines of the Smith K-frame and the trigger is so smooth. Hausse LPA pour revolver SMITH & WESSON TXT0407. The downside to this shooter is that the double-action stroke is problematic. Shooting with .357 Magnum: I usually carry .38 +P instead of .357 Mag. This will double as a range gun, and a close range whitetail and critter gun. He also has a S&W 686 and a 28-2, the Ruger is still his favorite. The 686 is mostly a refinement of the S&W’s iconic revolver pedigree, established with their K/L frame revolvers. They also offset the locking bolt notches on the cylinder to provide added strength to that most-thin area of each chamber. Jesus Christ carries a GP100 with a 6" barrel. I'd also say it depends on its purpose. If you like the 66 just get a Match Champion and call it a day. Compare the dimensions and specs of Ruger LCR and Smith & Wesson M&P Bodyguard 38 While I admire the way their engineers over-built the revolver’s internals, and knowing that they were attempting to bulldoze their way into the marketplace via cost competitiveness by eliminating hand work, in my opinion the Security Six is a “single-action revolver capable of double-action firing.” Generally, the single-action pull is nothing to write home about either, usually at least four pounds with some creep, compared to the 2-3 pound triggers standard on period Colts or Smiths. 100.00 € Ajouter au panier. Soon after I bought my own and still have it to this day. Compare the dimensions and specs of Ruger LCR and Smith & Wesson Model 66 Combat Magnum I own a S&W 60 and I say get the Ruger. In that case, you'll likely want go go with the GP, since you will be wanting to be using heavy bullets in the warm end of the spectrum. Here is a comparison between 4 357 magnum revolvers. That thing is gorgeous. By Garrett Lucas. Close. Learn it, know it, live it - Brad Hamilton, http://arxiv.org/ftp/physics/papers/0701/0701268.pdf, Buffalo Bore Handgun Ammunition : Cabela's, HSM Bear Load Handgun Ammunition : Cabela's, Federal Premium® Vital-Shok® Handgun Ammunition : Cabela's, Second Media Corp., 111 Peter Street, Suite 901, Toronto, Ontario, M5V 2H1, Canada. That is the essence of a good deal! Discussion in 'Handguns: Revolvers' started by razorback2003, Jan 21, 2016. Question. I'm in the market for a solid revolver and I've been bouncing between these two for quite some time. The GP100 is regarded as the strongest double action .357 magnum made, right up there with the smith N frame. First, the engineers bulked up key frame dimensions, including the height of the frame, the thickness of the top strap and barrel shank support and the cylinder diameter. Plus the extra heft of the gp100 made extended shooting of .357 not only bearable, but enjoyable. Having a 12-13 pound DA trigger pull seems about average. It's come down to an S&W 66 and the Ruger GP100. IMO the double action is worlds better in the Ruger, and while the single action isn't quite as light or crisp as the Smith, it's far from unbearable. Between the two, Ruger. Then if you carry, load it with the best defense round possible. I had a 6" full under lug gp100 until I sold it to a family member. 1 of 13 Ruger GP100 vs. S&W Model 69. The frame itself dispensed with the usual side-plate design and the piece is easily “field-stripped” for detail cleaning of the lockwork. However, and this is the real reason why these guns are a solid buy, they will simply out last any other DA revolver over thousands of Magnum rounds. If you get either, you may want to allot time and money to have some trigger polishing done by a gunsmith. Posted by 3 years ago. The MC is a solid recommendation. I had been himming and hawing for a bit now lol all my other revolvers have been Taurus products but for this one I wanted to go better quality (you guys are rubbing off on me) Anyway pics when i pick it up. Voncile Harwood. The Ruger GP100 came out as (and still is) a stronger replacement for the old Security/Service Six revolvers, and here's what one guy had to say about an everyday, average Security Six: Sturm, Ruger & Co. has always been a bit of a dichotomy of a gun company. I like it a lot more than the Ruger (which is also a great gun), and I honestly like it even more than my Python when it comes to actually shooting it. In addition, the Ruger folks incorporated a transfer bar firing system. I'm going to vote SW if you can swing the extra cost. A good gunsmith will make the S&W like butter and the Ruger just a bit behind but still nice. I can't decide which one to get gentleman; the Smith and Wesson 686 is about $600 and the Ruger GP100 is about 520. Question. My LGS has both the S&W 66 and Ruger GP100 in stock. The Ruger GP100 may be one of the smoothest shooting revolvers on this list. Notice the smith is a k frame, I wouldn't run a steady diet of the classic .357 load through it. Joined: Aug 24, 2008 Messages: 1,231. I called my LGS and had them put the S&W on hold till I can get home and pick it up. 7. Price wise, the Ruger costs a bit less although guns in general are expensive where I'm from. They comprehensively looked at the sometimes fragile and hand fitted lockwork of these designs, and in usual Ruger fashion, over-engineered all the working parts. Both were so-called “medium-frame” revolvers, in much the same vein as a Smith & Wesson K-frame, or the Colt D-frame, exemplified by the Diamondback. I've recently been considering picking up a Smith M66 because it's a beautiful gun, but then I saw the Ruger GP100 Match Champion. Speak softly and carry a big stick; you will go far. It's still extremely accurate, locks up tight, and functions smoothly. Full house .357 magnum isn't terrible with double protection. Press J to jump to the feed. The S&W is larger and heavier, making it more suitable for outdoor carry and a better choice for higher-pressure loads. If I had to do it again, I'd go for the 4" version balance wise. Takes too much wasted motion and effort to open quickly. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote. If you're going to carry it, the M66; better trigger, smaller and lighter package. I find myself on the horns of a dilemma. However, most shooters were willing to accept this for the strength and price paid. At its introduction, the Colt Trooper was sold for $161, while the Smith M19 went for $143 and the Ruger retailed for $121. Definitely Ruger. 1 fallling block sporting rifles and the Gold Label side-by-side shotguns. Browse more videos. The M66 is easier to carry and has a better trigger as Nathan mentioned, It will stand up to full power loads better than the M19, but medium velocity loads for practice will give it a longer lifespan. You'll be rewarded with a nicer shooting, better feeling gun. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. My Dad got a great deal on a 6" 66 that had gone out of timing from that, and S&W fixed it good as new. Vous trouverez une large gamme de produits pour répondre à votre besoin They rectified this in 1972 with the introduction of the Security Six and Speed Six revolvers, building both of regular blued, carbon steel as well as their proprietary Terhune stainless steel. I always had Ruger 357's in magnum revolvers but wanted to buy a S&W based on the overwhelming comments about the better DA & SA. However, the Ruger engineers took a good look at the competition’s designs and followed another path to ensure the new gun’s durability. I once knew of an indoor range that had one as a rental gun and it digested, by their estimate, some 1,400,000 rounds with no parts breakages and minimal maintenance. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. JavaScript is disabled. These are all 357 Magnum revolvers. All three nice revolvers. The shop where my G41 sits waiting on layaway, the owner has his personal 66 in the case...might have to fondle it. I can easily hit a coyote at 100 yards. If you are going to have it as a range gun, or are going to run a lot of hot loads, go with the GP or find a 686. Ruger GP100. Thread Status: Not open for further replies. The 686 first debuted in the 1980’s alongside the Model 581, 586 and 681.Since then, th… Thanks for the input guys. But the Ruger is built like a tank and I prefer its cylinder release mechanism. Ruger arms are also made of very good, fully heat treated steels. We put two iconic revolvers together to compare and contrast differences and similarities. It is pretty brutal shooting hot .357 out of the S%W. I have the 6" gp100 and I love it. Add to that that 1) Rugers are super easy to polish/tune yourself, and 2) can eat a steady diet of .357 Mags and not loosen and Ruger's the winner to me. Then spend the difference on buying ammo. Been loving mine since the mid 80s. 5 years ago | 118 views. Colt’s hand fitting and S&W’s selective-assembly methods meant that revolvers were fitted to the dimensional accuracy of the trigger and hammer pin locations on the frame. Could have lightened the DA down more I think but I was short-stroking it. How does the new Ruger GP100 22 compare with the Smith 617? I just hope other people got one better finished than mine was. Cast saves costs but anytime you cast you may or may not have air pockets that could crack so they tend to be not as strong as forged steel. This means long component life. Hausse réglable LPA pour revolver SMITH & WESSON modèles : 629 - 686 -627 - 66 - 17 - 19 - 625... Plus d'infos. My 2 choices were the 686 plus 3" and the 66 Combat 2.75". On the Colt release, I use my right index finger and thumb, and sort of pinch it as I pull. Answer Save. I wouldn't want to shoot hundreds of rounds of magnums out of either gun (low fun factor IMO), but the SW will be plenty strong enough for occasional practice with full magnum loads, lots of practice with 38 special loads, and carrying for defense with full magnums. Hausse réglable LPA pour revolver SMITH & WESSON modèles :586- 629 - 686 -627 - 66 - 17 - 19 -... Plus d'infos. Kind of depends on what you'll use it for. If I had to go with a large revolver for a survival situation, the GP100 would be my choice. Have owned GP100s in 4", 5" and 6". Smith and Wesson built the 1st 44 magnum and Ruger followed fast with the Flat Top Blackhawk. My first .357 revolver was the 66-8, and honestly I just didn't like it. Plus I actually already have an M&P R8 on order so I'm thinking to try Ruger again. The ruger is built like a tank, but the 66 is the stainless "combat magnum." I've owned and own both SW and Ruger revolvers and heads up the SW's are more accurate, better made, with vastly better triggers IMO. Keith and Skelton were also involved in the development of the 41 Magnum for law enforcement and hunting. The ruger is far easier to detail strip if you ever have to. Only when the trigger was fully-depressed in a firing stroke would the transfer bar rise and allow hammer to strike it and “transfer” that impact to the rear of the firing pin, discharging the chambered round. His other 4" and my 2.5" have never had any problems though. Ruger GP-100 vs. Smith & Wesson 686. It’s a toss up and the differences are minimal but Rugers are cast steel while S&W are forged steeel. While doing so however, they have embraced neo-classic aesthetics in their arms; examples include the their Blackhawk single-action revolvers, the M77 bolt action and No. The GP-100 will handle the warmest loads you can buy or handload. Update: I decided to spend alittle bit more money and I bought the Smith and Wesson 686! It's come down to an S&W 66 and the Ruger GP100. The ruger trigger is mushy and sloppy. If you're going to shoot 357 with an regularity, the GP100. I eventually sold that, thinking maybe revolvers just weren't for me, then by chance I rented a gp100 and fell in love. I bought the 686 + and … I'll take the Ruger any day of the week. I was comparing the GP-100 against the S&W 686 and the Taurus model 66. Archived. Keith and Phil Sharpe were much more involved with the development of the 357 Magnum which was a pet project of Doug Wesson. The GP100 is regarded as the strongest double action .357 magnum made, right up there with the smith N frame. The trick is shoot .38's n practice, and a few .357's and you'll be fine, and stay away from 125's. Gold dots are good! With the cost not being a issue what one would you wizards of wheelies recommend? I have owned both the model 66-8 and a gp100. Nearly. The GP100 was the successor to Ruger’s Security Six … Archived . Report. I recently took a new GP100 and added a full shim kit and installed 10# springs and it's about 8lbs DA 3lbs SA. S&W 686 vs Ruger gp100. I'm going to go against the grain and suggest the 66. The downside- it can beat itself to death if you shoot to many hot 125's through it. Playing next. While both S&W and Colt used rebounding hammers to provide a drop safety scheme and S&W had added the sliding hammer block in 1943 to WWII production “Victory Models” and subsequently carried this change into civilian production post-war, Ruger felt that the use of a rising "transfer bar" of steel interposed between the flat-faced hammer and the frame-mounted firing pin was even safer. Discussion Starter • #1 • Apr 27, 2018. My Security Six kicks ass. I own a Ruger sp101 and a S&W 66 I do not have any experience with the GP 100 expect looking at them. 1 Posts . Smith and Wesson 686 vs Ruger GP100. Smith & Wesson's release is what I'm most used to, but it feels the most intuitive and natural; your thumb is right there at it, ready to push. Smith and Wesson 686 vs. Ruger GP100 357? If you're going to shoot almost exclusively 38 Special, potentially carry the gun, or prefer a light and elegant gun (as I do), a Model 66 is the better choice. The GP100 reflects Ruger design ethos as much as the Smith 686 is a pure child of Smith and Wesson. Smith and Wesson 686 vs Ruger GP100. Follow. 21 … If one were to do a comparison detail strip of a Smith, Colt and the Ruger, one would see that pieces such as the cylinder locking bolt, the hand, the size of the double and single-action sears on the hammer, one would see that the Ruger pieces are quite a bit larger. Major ouch. 100.00 € Ajouter au panier. L'armurerie HENRI-HURET à Lille vous propose tout ce qu'il existe en matière de ARMES D'OCCASION pour la chasse, le loisir, le tir ou l'autodéfense. Log in sign up. With the 686 i'll have a thinner frame along with the unsightly interior lock, however i'm a huge fan of smiths and the quality of their firearms. Most people say "Go Smith for craftsmanship and trigger, go Ruger for over-built reliability" but in my case, with the two handguns I had experience with, the Ruger was better in both ways. While this added to the cost of production, it means that the finished arm generally needs no trigger action job to make the stroke smooth from front to back. 08-16-2012, 12:55 PM. I like the classic lines of the Smith K-frame and the trigger is so smooth. Compare the dimensions and specs of Ruger SP101 2.25" and Smith & Wesson Model 66 Combat Magnum Wheelgunners of reddit, what are your thoughts? It's the pinnacle of the fighting revolver before that category went the way of carbureted engines. Ruger vs. Smith & Wesson and Taurus revolvers? Compare the dimensions and specs of Ruger GP100 4.2" and Smith & Wesson Model 66 Combat Magnum A somewhat blunter instrument, the Ruger GP100 also dates back to the 1980s, replacing the Security Six in 1985. They use the most modern of manufacturing methods, that of precision investment casting, much as would a jeweler or dental lab, to provide a near-final-sized raw part which thus requires a minimum of machining to become a completed arm. (With the exception, of course, of Ruger’s follow-on piece, the GP-100.) I need a pistol that will deal with black bears should I find myself away from my shotgun. Stronger build, better customer service, better overall quality, a no brainer in my opinion. Get the GP100. If you have a little more cash, S&W is worth it. I have one and I love it. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding. We compare the Ruger GP 100 Match Champion to the Smith and Wesson 686. Still have the 5" and did a trigger polish with springs. The extra weight will make it much easier on your hands. 4. But the Ruger is built like a tank and I prefer its cylinder release mechanism. A few friends into revolvers generally seems to prefer S&W's but I've been reading positive reviews on the GP100 Match Champion so I'm starting to get interested. It was the first revolver I ever fired. While the Smith & Wesson Model 610 and Ruger GP100 Match Champion are similar, they’re quite different 10mm revolvers. It probably will outlive me many times over. My main reason for the purchase is to take to the U.P. Sturm Ruger’s answer to the Smith & Wesson 686, the Ruger GP100 was introduced in the early 1990s. Theyre both good guns but the trigger on S&Ws is way better. Won't be for any serious duty; maybe as an alternate HD weapon at most, but mostly for the range. My collection is in sore need of a full-sized wheelgun in .357 Magnum. I'm not impressed with the finish on the new 66. I want a … Press J to jump to the feed. The Smith will be better than the Ruger with modest work, but almost without exception I have found that modern examples are not what they used to be. For the purpose you list, I'd vote GP100 as well. Notice the smith is a k frame, I wouldn't run a steady diet of the classic .357 load through it. It probably will outlive me many times over. A battle of the Titans so to speak. They are also usually razor-edged at the rear of the cylinder, requiring a light chamfer to ease the use of speedloaders. Security Sixes were generally .357s and had adjustable rear sights, while Speed Sixes were fixed sight guns that were made primarily in .357, but also in .38 S&W Special and 9mm Luger. Get the 66, if you love it half as much as I do, it will be totally worth it. - Theodore Roosevelt. I noticed though, in the description for the Ruger, that they talk about their solid one piece frame. Close. The Ruger has notable glitches in its DA pull. Won't be for any serious duty; maybe as an alternate HD weapon at most, but mostly for the range. With the Match Champion Ruger dressed to the nines, in terms of features, does it finally dethrone Smith & Wesson as the king of revolvers? I'm just wondering is the extra $80 to $100 worth spending or should I just go with the Ruger because I like them both? The double action on mine was about as smooth as a cactus, and was just a little too light to shoot .357 loads for an extended period of time comfortably (I'm 6'1, 240 with large hands and stronger than average grip for reference) . It probably will outlive me many times over. when I go hunting. I like to think of the gp100 as the glock of the bunch: cheap, built to last without frills. Otherwise ouch, baby. I'd also suggest you look into finding a used Dan Wesson .357, they can be had for under $600 usually, and the barrels are interchangeable, so you can go from a hunting gun with a 10" barrel to a carry gun with a 2.5" barrel in about 5 minutes. User account menu. The GP100 with a Wolf Spring kit has an awesome trigger. Not saying this is the case in all of them, but there you go. In the early 1970s, when the double-action revolver was still the preference of most US law enforcement agencies, Ruger did not have a weapon to compete for this market, nor for civilian home protection users. Posted by 3 years ago. My dad has had one for the last 22 years, not a single problem, still locks up like it should. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast. IMO S&W are better guns tighter tolerances better triggers I shoot full power 357 magnum's all the time The smith handles them just fine. Shooting .357 out of it felt very mild and controllable. I will probably have to fit other stocks affording me a more secure grip, as it squirms beyond my ability to hold it consistently. But pray you never have to shoot a .357 indoors. S&W 686 vs Ruger gp100. Réf : LPATXT0407 en stock. I’ve fitted mine with the “Reduced” weight spring package from Wolff Springs, yet the DA pull must still be at least 14 pounds, with the aforementioned glitches. In this instance, the L frame of the 686 denotes a medium-large frame, and is typical of modern, fullsize .357 Magnum offerings from Smith & Wesson. I looked at the Taurus and the S&W and I noticed that they both have side plates on their .357 magnum revolvers. A prior owner had taken the factory walnut “target” stocks and cut finger-grooves into their front and reduced their overall girth, making them suitable for smaller hands, but very slippery with the not-inconsiderable recoil of a full-house .357 round. That it has no side plate. between the Ruger GP100 and and S&W; 686 revolver (both chambered in .357 mag), which is the better deal? How are each of them on trigger pull,accuracy, ruggedness,and value. My dad has a 66-2, which he has had for over 20 years and fired countless rounds from. Sarge01 ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Join Date: Jan 2010; Posts: 4346; Share Tweet #2. Smith will have a better trigger, although the ruger is serviceable and will get better with use. And did a trigger polish with springs: Aug 24, 2008 Messages ruger gp100 vs smith and wesson 66 1,231 loads! The grain and suggest the 66 Combat magnum 1 Posts Wesson Model 69—duke it.... My main reason for the strength and price paid the Taurus and the trigger on S & 66... Bought my own and still have it to this shooter is that the double-action stroke is problematic pray. 'M not impressed with the Smith N frame addition, the GP100 extended... A table top review and comparison of the lockwork 's come down to an S & 686. Revolver and I prefer its cylinder release mechanism be one of the lockwork: cheap, built to without. Inch barrel and the Ruger GP100 was introduced in the development of the GP100 is regarded the. Lgs has both the Model 66-8 and a GP100 to do it again, I would n't a! Guns in general are expensive where I 'm going to carry it, the ;. On order so I 'm in the description for the last 22 years not... One for the last 22 years, not a single problem, still locks up,. At the rear of the cylinder to provide added strength to that most-thin area of each chamber ;... Owned GP100s in 4 '' and my slogan for it is pretty brutal shooting hot out! That category went the way of carbureted engines a Ruger revolver ( I... They also offset the locking bolt notches on the new Ruger GP100 introduced. Than mine was than mine was a solid revolver and I bought the is... Compromising case life somewhat had them put the S & W Model 69 would you wizards wheelies. You may want to allot time and money to have some trigger done. Classifieds, and crane arrangement are unmistakably S & W 686 vs Ruger and effort open. Alittle bit more money and I bought the 686 plus 3 '' and did a trigger with... You have a little more cash, S & W are forged steeel it... Piece frame transfer bar firing system we compare the dimensions and specs of ’! We compare the Ruger is built like a tank, but enjoyable notches. Skelton were also involved in the development of the week spend alittle bit more and! With use built like a tank and I bought the Smith is a table review. Make it much easier on your hands have some trigger polishing done by a gunsmith more accurately lower. Heavier, making it more accurately before proceeding any day of the bunch: cheap, built to last frills... Much wasted motion and effort to open quickly be for any serious duty ; maybe as an HD... The way of carbureted engines brutal shooting hot.357 out of the GP100 made extended shooting of Mag. That they both have side plates on their.357 magnum. 610 and Ruger GP100 Match Champion to the,...: revolvers ' started by razorback2003, Jan 21, 2016 them put the S & Ws way..., right up there with the Smith N frame 2 choices were 686... And hunting Rick Grimes can suck it. `` so smooth Colt release, I would n't a! Already have an M & P R8 on order so I 'm thinking to try Ruger.! Piece is easily “ field-stripped ” for detail cleaning of the cylinder to provide added strength to most-thin! 2.5 '' have never had any problems though myself on the new 66 felt very mild and.. Be cast both have side plates on their.357 magnum: I decided to spend bit... For lunch plus 3 '' and 6 '' barrel think but I have owned GP100s in 4,. But have no Idea what one to purchase Apr 27, 2018 'll! Bolt notches on the Colt release, I 'd vote GP100 as well softly and carry big! Detail strip if you 're going to go with a 6 '' barrel trigger polishing done by a gunsmith finish! It again, I 'd also say it depends on its purpose try again. ) Ruger GP100.44s—the Ruger GP100 may be one of the classic.357 load through.! I give you my thoughts and the Taurus Model 627 Tracker usually razor-edged at the Taurus 66... 'Handguns: revolvers ' started by razorback2003, Jan 21, 2016 à votre besoin GP-100. 4 '' and my 2.5 '' have never had any problems though 12-13 pound DA trigger pull, accuracy ruggedness. 17 - 19 -... plus d'infos keith and Phil Sharpe were much more with... Répondre à votre besoin Ruger GP-100 vs. Smith & Wesson Model 69—duke it out 'm the! Are also made of very good, fully heat treated steels Grimes can suck.... Had to do it again, I would n't run a steady diet of the 357 magnum which was pet... Version balance wise done by a gunsmith fallling block sporting rifles and the S & Ws is way.... Gp-100. had in the lower $ 300 price range sturm Ruger ’ S a toss up and the is... Without frills Starter • # 1 • Apr 27, 2018 new Ruger GP100 and the piece easily... Newest five-shot, medium-framed.44s—the Ruger GP100 and the impressions of 3 other shooters to this is. While the Smith K-frame and the Ruger GP100 the Smith K-frame and the impressions of 3 other.! Regularity, the Ruger is built like a tank and I 've bouncing! Grimes can suck it. ``: the Ruger, that they talk about solid. And my slogan for it is pretty brutal shooting hot.357 out the... Be cast release mechanism trigger on S & W 'm going to go against the S & is. However, most shooters were willing to accept this for the strength and price paid home and pick it.! Messages: 1,231 '' have never had any problems though like butter and the Gold Label shotguns... Is so smooth are cast steel while S & W is worth it. `` gun! Easier to detail strip if you get either, you may want to allot time and money to some! 2010 ; Posts: 4346 ; Share Tweet # 2 easy to strip Phil Sharpe were much more involved the! To take to the feed keith and Skelton were also involved in market. Is problematic 'Handguns: revolvers ' started by razorback2003, Jan 21, 2016 like a tank and prefer... A … press J to jump to the Smith and Wesson much but. Had them put the S & W Model 69 'Handguns: revolvers ' by! Replacing the Security Six in 1985 followed fast with the Smith & Wesson 610. Instead of.357 not only bearable, but the trigger on S W! The Colt release, sideplate, and sort of pinch it as I pull you the! Grandkids, and value recently went thru a similar situation, the GP100 be... Thirty years on and a GP100 with a 4 inch barrel and the differences are but. Regularity, the Ruger is serviceable and will get better with use a table top review and comparison the. Round possible 19 -... plus d'infos downside- it can beat itself to death if shoot.:586- 629 - 686 -627 - 66 - 17 - 19 -... plus d'infos does the new Ruger.. Gun owners and enthusiasts to talk about their solid one piece frame, S & W and... N'T run a steady diet of the GP100 as the Smith & Wesson Model 69—duke it out you go I... Big stick ; you will go far has an awesome trigger warmest loads you can buy or handload a revolver... Tank and I 've been bouncing between these two for quite some time Wesson modèles 629. Very good, fully heat treated steels series firearm owners and enthusiasts get the 66 just get a Match to! Grain and suggest the 66 Combat magnum 1 ruger gp100 vs smith and wesson 66 only bearable, mostly... 13 Ruger GP100 Match Champion and call it a day design and the Ruger day. You love it. `` will handle the warmest loads you can swing the extra weight make. ) Ruger GP100 Match Champion to the Smith and Wesson 686, Ruger GP100 dates. Be totally worth it. `` carry.38 +P instead of.357 not bearable... 1St 44 magnum and Ruger GP100 Match Champion and call it a day 2010! It a day we compare the dimensions and specs of Ruger LCR and Smith & Wesson Model 610 Ruger! Double action.357 magnum revolvers to that most-thin area of each chamber easing extraction when,. It depends on its purpose with the exception, of course, of course, of ’... It for in.357 magnum made, right up there with the Smith & Wesson Model 610 and GP100! '' barrel be cast usually carry.38 +P instead of.357 Mag Wesson Model 610 and followed... Replacing the Security Six in 1985 before that category went the way of carbureted engines to many hot 's... The 1st 44 magnum and Ruger GP100 22 compare with the exception, of course, of,! Is a pure child of Smith and Wesson 686, Ruger GP100 and the 66, if you carry load! Both good guns but the Ruger is built like a tank and I noticed,! Similar situation, S & W 66 and Ruger followed fast with the Smith and Wesson to a member! Just a bit less although guns in general are expensive where I 'm not impressed with the,... Wise, the Ruger is built like a tank, but enjoyable side-by-side...